20 Mar 2024 - 09:35:30
In this episode, we discuss CAAF's decision in United States v. Ramirez.
Specifically, we examine when a military judge must allow questions
concerning racial bias during voir dire - while discussing voir dire and
bias generally. Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center
and School by visiting our website at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/ or on
Facebook (tjaglcs), Instagram (tjaglcs), or LinkedIn (school/tjaglcs).
RSS Test - The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center & School
08 Mar 2024 - 13:04:25
In this episode, we discuss CAAF's decision in United States v. Warda.
Here, the CAAF examines the remedy when the Government is unable to
produce documents required by Rule for Courts-Martial 703. The Court
provides rules for practitioners concerning their discovery obligations.
Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School by
visiting our website at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/ or on Facebook
(tjaglcs), Instagram (tjaglcs), or LinkedIn (school/tjaglcs).
22 Feb 2024 - 08:41:05
In this episode, we discuss CAAF's decision in United States v. Brown.
Specifically, we examine CAAF's view of Part IV of the Manual for
Courts-Marital and what constitutes "presence" for disrespect
of a noncommissioned officer. Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s
Legal Center and School on Facebook (tjaglcs), LinkedIn (tjaglcs), or
visit our website for more resources at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/leapp
You can also connect directly with the Criminal Law Department on
Facebook (tjaglcs_crimlaw) or Instagram (tjaglcs_crimlaw)
07 Feb 2024 - 15:53:22
In this episode, we examine CAAF’s latest case concerning unlawful
command influence. Specifically, we examine the difference between
actual and apparent unlawful command influence, and the influence that
judge advocates can have on the system. Connect with The Judge Advocate
General’s Legal Center and School on Facebook (tjaglcs), LinkedIn
(tjaglcs), or visit our website for more resources at
https://tjaglcs.army.mil/leapp You can also connect directly with the
Criminal Law Department on Facebook (tjaglcs_crimlaw) or Instagram (tjaglcs_crimlaw)
24 Jan 2024 - 14:08:09
In this episode, we examine CAAF’s analysis concerning when an accused
makes a prima facie (pronounced pree-muh fah-shuh according to the
majority of the criminal law department) showing that race played a role
in the panel selection process at their court martial, whether that
panel was properly constituted. The Court weighed their previous
precedent which allowed a race conscious selection process for the
purpose of inclusion in contrast with the Supreme Court’s ruling in US v
Batson which said “race is an impermissible criterion for selection of
jurors.” This case is very important for judge advocates to understand
as they advise their commanders on selecting court martial members
(jurors). Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and
School on Facebook (tjaglcs), LinkedIn (tjaglcs), or visit our website
for more resources at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/leapp You can also
connect directly with the Criminal Law Department on Facebook
(tjaglcs_crimlaw) or Instagram (tjaglcs_crimlaw)