(From left to right) Major Steve Warburton, MAJ Chris Chatelain, Major James Trescothic-Martin, and Captain Kathleen Brook attend the British Army Legal Services 75th Anniversary Dinner in London, England. (Photo courtesy of author)
Robo
Gen[1] from a
Legal Exchange Officer in the United Kingdom
By Major Christopher M. Chatelain
The
U.S. Army Judge Advocate General's (JAG) Corps has more than 9,700 active duty,
Reserve, National Guard, and civilian attorneys, legal administrators, and
paralegals.[2]
Of this population, only four serve as legal exchange officers, with three of
these positions created in the past five years.[3]
Two of those exchange positions help maintain the "special relationship"[4] between the
United States and the United Kingdom (U.K.). Not surprisingly, the JAG Corps's
small but growing prioritization of exchange officers comes at a time when the
Department of Defense placed increased importance on interoperability with
allies and partners.[5]
In an era of heightened geopolitical competition between major powers,
adversary exploitation of rapidly evolving domains and technologies, and
instability from transboundary challenges,[6]
unity of effort between allies and partners has never been so complex or important
for U.S. national security interests. This article seeks to demystify legal
exchange officer positions — explaining how and why the Military Personnel
Exchange Program (MPEP) works, highlighting how the JAG Corps leverages legal
exchange officers, and then illustrating how these efforts translate into legal
interoperability by way of example with the British Army Legal Services (ALS).
U.S.
law and policy authorize and govern U.S. exchange officer positions. Exchange
officers typically serve as part of a reciprocal, one-for-one exchange of U.S.
and partner-nation army personnel.[7] Section 311
of Title 10 of the U.S. Code creates The Defense Personnel Exchange Program
(DPEP) as a security cooperation program permitting mutual exchange of defense
personnel.[8]
Based on this authorization, the Secretary of Defense delegated authority to
administer the Military Personnel Exchange Program (MPEP), a component of DPEP,
to the Service secretaries via Department of Defense Directive 5230.20.[9] Based on this
delegation, the U.S. Army governs its contribution to the MPEP through Army
Regulation 614-10.[10]
The
MPEP has three primary purposes to help achieve national security cooperation
goals and combatant commanders' theatre campaign plans. First, the MPEP
strengthens alliances and coalitions by building partner capacity and
maintaining or enhancing friendly relationships.[11] Second, the
MPEP increases U.S. and partner-nation cooperation by integrating U.S. and
partner-nation personnel.[12]
Third, the program prepares U.S. officers and noncommissioned officers for
future assignments in support of multinational operations.[13]
Many stakeholders have responsibilities related to
executing the MPEP. The deputy chief of staff (DCS), G-3/5/7 has general staff responsibility
for the Army MPEP.[14]
The Army Service Component Commands (ASCCs) develop, plan, and integrate Army
exchange programs that support their combatant commanders' theatre campaign
plan.[15]
Through the ASCCs, the DCS, G-3/5/7 serves as the lead agent for negotiating
MPEP memoranda of agreement (MOAs) with partner nations.[16]
Once the DCS, G3/5/7 establishes a country program,
U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) selects and assigns U.S. Army personnel
for the MPEP positions.[17]
Positions are nominative, and HRC must ensure that MPEP nominees satisfy the
selection criteria outlined in the exchange program's corresponding MOAs.[18]
Once HRC identifies nominees, the ASCCs forward their information to the
partner/host nation for approval or disapproval.[19] For Army legal
exchange officers, the Talent Management Office performs these duties for HRC.[20]
Simultaneously, partner nations' military attachés submit their Army exchange
personnel nominees to the recipient Department of the Army (DA) command and
through the DCS, G-2 for approval.[21]
Once nations agree upon specific exchange personnel, ASCCs have overall
responsibility for MPEP coordination and support activities within their
combatant commands' area of responsibility.[22]
Recognizing the importance of allies and partners, the JAG Corps
leverages the MPEP to enhance legal interoperability. The JAG Corps Strategy
highlights that "[a]lliances and partnerships are among the greatest sources of
our military strength."[23] Accordingly, the JAG Corps
contributes to maintaining and expanding the Army's network of allies and
partners through the interrelated concepts of security cooperation and legal
interoperability.[24] With exchanges being one of the JAG Corps's
five legal interoperability lines of effort (LOEs),[25]
legal exchange officers constitute a critical component of the JAG Corps's
contribution to multinational interoperability.
The JAG Corps defines legal interoperability as "[t]he achievement of shared understanding of respective authorities,
permissions, restrictions, obligations, and interpretations of international
and domestic law and policy that enables the Combined Force to act together
lawfully, coherently, effectively, and efficiently, to achieve tactical,
operational, and strategic objectives."[26] Practically, this means that "[w]e
must be able to successfully support the integration of allied and partner
capabilities into a single, lawfully-conducted, unified operation across each
and every warfighting function."[27]
With ASCCs responsible for MPEP programs within their
theaters, the ASCCs' Offices of the Staff Judge Advocate ensure that legal
exchange officers' security cooperation and legal interoperability activities
align with their theater's LOEs. For example, the U.S. Army Europe and Africa
(USAREUR-AF) Office of the Judge Advocate (OJA) nests its legal exchange
officers' activities within USAREUR-AF's LOEs. One of those LOEs is to increase
the scale, capability, and interoperability of allies and partners through
activities such as multinational exercises, multinational training and
education, and senior leader engagements.[28]
These laws, policies, and procedures result in one of the most
impactful, challenging, interesting, and rewarding jobs that the JAG Corps has
to offer. By way of illustration, MPEP Position UK-69 establishes an exchange
of national security law attorneys between 3rd (U.K.) Division, the U.K.'s
warfighting division, and III Armored Corps.[29] The corresponding position
descriptions for the U.S. and British lawyers focus on participation in partner
country exercises and enhancing legal interoperability through working-level defense
engagement.[30]
Members of the 3rd United Kingdom Legal Branch (wearing 1st Cavalry Division baseball hats) pose with members of the 1st Cavalry Division Office of the Staff Judge Advocate after Exercise WARFIGHTER 23.4 at Ft. Cavazos, Texas. (Photo courtesy of author)
At
the individual level, the judge advocate (JA) exchange officer principally
works for the British Army. An MPEP officer should not be confused with a
liaison officer. The ALS only has 109 lawyers,[31]
but they exchange one British attorney to utilize a U.S. Army JA in their
premier warfighting division. As such, the JA must pull their weight in the
day-to-day workload expected of a British Army lawyer. This includes deploying
with British Army division and brigade headquarters on exercises, advising
commanders on British military disciplinary and administrative law, attending
and leading unit training, attending routine divisional staff meetings,
maintaining marksmanship on an assigned SA-80 assault rifle (comparable to the
M4 carbine), participating in unit physical fitness sessions and British Army
physical fitness tests, and all the other tasks inherent with being part of a
British divisional staff officer and British Army soldier.
Being
a JA legal exchange officer, however, involves more than being a legal advisor
for a foreign military. Interoperability has three essential elements—technical,
procedural, and human.[32]
Fundamentally, the human domain of interoperability involves cultivating
lasting personal and professional relationships. Shared hardship from field
exercises, arduous professional military education, and strenuous physical
training create enduring trust and confidence within a team. Sharing a
proverbial and literal foxhole inherently brings people together. I spent
approximately a quarter of my two-year assignment on various field exercises,
often living in crew shelters and Warrior armored vehicles with British soldiers
of all ranks and backgrounds. I attended the British Army Winter Mountain
Foundations Course, climbing the frigid Scottish Highlands with fellow members
of the 3rd (U.K.) Division staff. And, I sweated alongside the division staff
during grueling physical fitness sessions. In doing so, I developed lifelong friendships
based on respect, trust, and confidence.
Moreover,
maintaining the type of enduring relationships envisioned by the MPEP involves
more than having a shared military experience. The MOU that governs the
U.S.-U.K. program contains candidate selection criteria aimed at rooting
military families in their host nation.[33]
As such, my family attended British schools, participated in British sports
groups, had British neighbors, and attended British Army family events. In
doing so, my entire JAG Corps family developed roots in the U.K. that will
persist long after my tour.
Beyond
these aims, a legal exchange officer must leverage their connection with the
ASCC, and U.S. Army writ large, to create opportunities that enhance the
procedural and human domains of interoperability between organizations. The
officer should establish opportunities for combined training between the United
States and allied nations, leveraging relationships to optimize those
opportunities for increased interoperability. For example, I helped generate
short-term exchanges where JAs accompanied ALS officers on British Army
warfighting exercises, and vice versa. In one instance, I worked with the Joint
Readiness Training Center JA observer coach/trainer and a rotational brigade JA
to embed an ALS officer into the U.S. brigade legal section during a training
rotation at Fort Johnson, Louisiana. Similarly, I worked with the USAREUR-AF
OJA and the 7th Mission Support Command to embed a Reserve JA with an ALS
officer during a British armored brigade combat team's warfighting exercise at
Salisbury Plains Training Area, England.
These
short-term exchanges build a wider bench of JAG Corps and ALS officers with
multinational expertise. The opportunities provide first-hand insight into
their ally's capabilities. They enable an understanding of how an ally provides
legal support to operations. Finally, they widen both armies' networks of
multinational lawyers for future operations and exercises. Legal exchange
officers are uniquely situated to identify and create these opportunities and
see them through to completion.
Likewise,
with one foot in both armies, an MPEP officer is uniquely situated to unite key
leaders and subject matter experts from allied nations. For example, I helped
bring together Mr. Fred Borch, our recently retired JAG Corps regimental historian,
field grade officers from USAREUR-AF, and about a quarter of the ALS's
officers, including the ALS head of operational law, during an ALS-led staff
ride in Germany to study the International Military Tribunal and subsequent
Nuremberg trials occurring immediately after World War II. This event aided JAG
Corps and ALS officers in building personal relationships. It also provided the
ALS officers with unique insight into America's past contribution to
international tribunals and contemporary lessons learned from the U.S.
experience with the Guantanamo Military Commissions.
Although
a small contingent, legal exchange officers significantly increase legal
interoperability with partners and allies at a time when national security
requires transformative cooperation.[34]
To overcome the most complex and grave threats to rules-based international
order in recent history, like-minded allies and partners are working
collectively to address our shared challenges.[35]
This strategic goal cannot be accomplished without legal interoperability, which
is the purpose of the modest cohort of legal exchange officers. The MPEP
enables this cohort, thereby providing the JAG Corps with a vital tool to
enhance multinational legal interoperability in a direct and lasting way. Thus,
to our partners and allies working together for a safer world, the senior JAs
at the Office of The Judge Advocate General and ASCCs who support the MPEP
program, and the U.S., U.K., Australian, and Polish legal exchange officers of
past, present, and future—THANK YOU, CHEERS, TA, and dzięki!
MAJ Chatelain is the Deputy Chief of
Administrative Law for the Office of the Staff Judge Advocate, U.S. Army
Pacific, at Fort Shafter, Hawaii. He previously served as the U.S. Legal
Exchange Officer to the 3rd (United Kingdom) Division at Bulford Camp, United
Kingdom.
[1] "Gen" is British Army slang for "trustworthy
information." However, "gen" has varying degrees of trustworthiness. "Scoff
House Gen" has the lowest degree of trustworthiness. "Scoff house" is slang for
"dining facility." Telling incorrect "scoff house gen" does not result in
adverse social consequences except for mild public ridicule. "Eyebrows gen"
assures a higher level of trustworthiness. If the "eyebrows gen" turns out to
be incorrect (also known as "duff gen"), the person telling the "duff gen" must
shave off his or her eyebrows. "Robo gen" assures an even higher degree of
trustworthiness, such that a person telling "robo gen" must shave his or her
head to look like Robocop without a helmet. The British Army has other, less
common adaptations of "gen," which vary based on unit. If the inaccurate or
untruthful individual fails to perform the consequence related to the appropriate
level of "gen," significant social implications ensue. Although the author did not suffer
any consequences from providing "duff gen," these assertions are nevertheless
based on the author's recent professional experience as an exchange officer
with the British Army as part of the Military Personnel Exchange Program from 3
July 2022-July 2024 [hereinafter Professional Experiences].
[2] JALS Strength Report, 2024
Worldwide Continuing Legal Education, at slide 3 (Sept. 2024) (unpublished
PowerPoint presentation) (on file with author).
[3] The JAG Corps has an O-5 stationed
with the British Army Headquarters, an O-4 stationed with 3rd (U.K.) Division,
an O-4 stationed with the Polish Armed Forces General Command, and an O-3(P)
stationed with 1st (Australian) Division. The position with the 1st
(Australian) Division is not reciprocal. Additionally, the Bundeswehr has
assigned a non-reciprocal military legal advisor to The Center for Law and
Military Operations. Professional Experiences, supra note 1.
[5] U.S. Dep’t of Def., National Defense Strategy of the United States of America sec. IV (2022) [hereinafter NDS]; see also Secretary Hegseth’s Message to the Force, U.S. Dep’t of Def. (Jan. 25, 2025), https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/4040940/secretary-hegseths-message-to-the-force.
[6] NDS, supra note 5, sec. II.
[7] U.S.
Dep't of Army, Reg. 614-10, Army Military Personnel Exchange Program with
Military Services of Other Nations para. 1-6 (14 July 2011) [hereinafter AR
614-10].
[8] 10
U.S.C. § 311; see U.S.
Def. Sec. Coop. Univ., Handbook,
Security Cooperation Programs 30 (2021).
[9] U.S. Dep't of Def., Dir. 5230.20, Visits and Assignments of Foreign Nationals
(22 June 2005).
[10] See AR 614-10, supra note 7.
[16] Id. paras. 1-4(b)(2), 2-1,
2-2(7)(c) (the DCS,
G-3/5/7 also obtains concurrence from the Office of the Secretary of Defense
Policy before finalizing or altering programs).
[18] Id.; see
also
Memorandum from James Hennessey Jr. & Timothy Thompson, subject: Memorandum
of Understanding Between the Government of the United States and the Government
of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland on the Reciprocal
Exchange of Army Personnel, sec. IV (17 Feb. 1988) [hereinafter U.S.-U.K. MOU].
[19] AR
614-10, supra note 7, para. 3-3.
[20] Professional Experiences, supra note
1.
[21] Id. paras. 2-2(f), 5-3.
[23] Off.
of The Judge Advoc. Gen., The Strategy of the Judge
Advocate General's Corps 2022
[hereinafter JAGC Strategy].
[25] Lieutenant Colonel Andrew Farquhar
& Lieutenant Colonel Christopher T. Franca,
U.S. Army JAG Corps & British Army Legal Services Exchange Officer
Working Group, at slide 7 (May 2022) (unpublished PowerPoint presentation) (on
file with author).
[26] The
Judge Advoc. Gen.'s Legal Ctr. & Sch., U.S. Army, Best Practices of Multinational Legal Interoperability
Smartbook A-3 (2024).
[27] Lieutenant Colonel Justin
Marchesi, Foundations of Multinational Legal Interoperability, Army Law., no. 5, 2021, at 2, 3.
[28] U.S. Army Europe and Africa,
USAREUR-AF AOR and Operational Approach, at slide 2 (May 2023) (unpublished
PowerPoint presentation) (on file with author).
[29] See Memorandum from Deputy
Chief of Staff, G-3/5/7, subject: Execution Approval for a Reciprocal Military
Personnel Exchange Program Position with the United Kingdom (U.K.-69) (June 8,
2020).
[30] See Position Description,
U.K.-69, Deputy Chief of Staff, G-3/5/7, subject: For U.S. Army Participant
with the British Army; Position Description, U.K.-69, Deputy Chief of Staff,
G-3/5/7, subject: Position Description for British Army Participation with the
U.S. Army.
[31] E-mail from Major Matthew Gosnell
to author (Aug. 23, 2023) (on file with author).
[32] U.S.
Dep't of Army, Reg. 34-1, Interoperability para. 1-8(c) (9 Apr. 2020).
[33] See U.S.-U.K. MOU, supra note 18, sec. 4(a)(v).
[34] The
White House, National Security Strategy 16 (Oct. 2022).
[35] NDS, supra note 5, at 14.