The seal of the U.S. Army Court of Criminal Appeals. (Photo courtesy of
author)
Assembling and Impaneling Tomorrow’s JAG Corps
By Colonel Timothy P. Hayes, Jr.
“The court is assembled.” A trial judge utters this legally
significant phrase in every court-martial.[1]
At the most fundamental level, these words announce that all the
necessary players are present and the proceeding can commence. These
players include the attorneys and support personnel detailed to the
court and the panel members who the convening authority selects. The
Military Justice Act of 2016[2]
introduced an additional term to the vernacular of the preliminary
proceedings of a court-martial: impanelment.[3]
Impanelment signifies the selection of the members who will
participate for the duration of the trial, after the vetting process
known as voir dire.[4]
This exercise of detailing, selection, and assembly followed by voir
dire and impanelment serves as a useful analogy for building the Judge
Advocate General’s Corps of the future, which is the focus of this
edition of The Army Lawyer. Assembling the necessary players
through detailing and panel selection is analogous to recruiting new
military legal professionals from the Army ranks and the civilian
sector. Impaneling those who will remain for the duration of the
proceedings is akin to our efforts to retain the most desirable
members of the team, in any component, for as long as they are willing
to serve.
So, what does that preliminary court-martial process look like? And
how might it inform how we, as a regiment, go about the process of
recruitment and retention? The vetting that occurs before assembly and
impanelment is accomplished through panel member questionnaires and
individual and group voir dire. These questions are carefully crafted,
or should be, to ensure the best-qualified people serve on our
court-martial panels. We ask about their experiences in the courtroom
and in life. We want to know about their personal history, their
standards, their biases, and their judgment. These can be difficult
questions to ask and even more difficult to answer, but they serve a
critical purpose.
The time and effort we expend detailing and selecting participants
for a court-martial reflects the gravity of the task the participants
are there to accomplish. We should put commensurate time and effort
into recruiting and retaining the future members of our regiment.
After all, the next recruit could end up serving upwards of thirty
years in our ranks and serve in positions of immense responsibility,
establishing policies that could change the course of our Corps. So,
what are the questions we should be asking our future cohort to ensure
the most consequential practice of law on Earth continues to be
practiced by some of Earth’s most consequential people? I would like
to offer what I believe are the most important questions we can ask
about a potential recruit or a candidate for retention: what is their
character, and are they committed to service?
In the past, we spoke so often of character, competence, and
commitment that those words became a precursor to today’s four
constants of our Corps: mastery of the law, principled counsel,
stewardship of the profession, and servant leadership.[5]
As competence, to a large extent, can be taught—particularly to a
person of character and commitment—I recommend concentrating on
character and commitment. Conversely, character is formed over time
through a variety of sources and experiences and arguably cannot be
taught, although it can be modeled. Commitment is a resolve that is
also forged over time and is, I would argue, a byproduct of character
traits such as responsibility, dependability, and resiliency.
It would be hard to argue those traits—and other character traits
such as those embodied in the traditional Army values of loyalty,
duty, respect, selfless service, honor, integrity, and personal
courage[6]—could be inculcated in a young judge advocate (JA) in the Officer
Basic Course. If they do not possess those traits, at least to some
degree, when they assess into the Corps, it is unlikely the traits
will suddenly spring forth over a few short weeks of training. Even if
they did, would those character traits be so ingrained in that young
JA that, when faced with adversity, they would have the fortitude to
stand against the tide?
Investiture photo of COL Hayes. (Photo courtesy of author)
Why are these character traits, and the commitment to honor them, so
vital to service in our Corps? I have always believed the answer lies
in the oath our recruits will swear to or affirm at the outset of
their career and at each of its significant milestones.[7]
While all Soldiers take an oath to defend the Constitution, no one
defends it more directly or impactfully than a JA. A JA defends the
very words and ideals of that most sacred document and ensures the
rights of the very people those words and ideals should most
protect. To do this well requires character. To do this well over a
prolonged period of time requires a commitment—a commitment to
selfless service. Therefore, we must recruit people of character, and
we must retain those who have shown that commitment to selfless
service.
While it may be easy for me to say as I am not the one trying to keep
the trains running, I would rather have ten JAs of character and
commitment than 100 who lack either or both. The great William
Shakespeare strikes a similar chord in his play
Henry the Fifth.[8]
With a little poetic license, I have adapted Shakespeare’s recounting
of King Henry’s great St. Crispin’s Day speech on the eve of the
Battle of Agincourt.[9]
My hope is it may inspire those who will continue to serve to recruit
and retain people of character and commitment after I am gone. That is
how our regiment will continue to be the one for which we have fought
for so many years:
God’s will! The fewer men and women, the greater share of honor!
I pray thee, beloved Corps, wish not one man or woman more.
Be not covetous for a lieutenant’s silver bars.
Concern yourself not which other men or women might next my robes
wear;
Such pedestrian concerns of faces and spaces are beneath us.
Faith, my regiment, wish not one more captain or colonel.
Rather proclaim it, throughout our Corps, that he who hath no stomach
for this fight,
Let him depart; his DD214 shall be made, and separation pay if due
put into his purse;
We would not serve in that man or woman’s company
Who prays for professional advantage, or a plum assignment, as
condition to serve with us.
Let those be on their way, and remember them no more.
Rather, look left, right, and ahead,
At those committed to serve with you,
And those that will follow.
For those are the names that shall with me be remembered.
And a day shall ne’er go by,
From this day to the ending of my life,
But those names, living and dead, shall be remembered with me—
We few, we privileged few, we band of brothers.
A few years ago, I came across a letter my wife’s grandfather
received from the commanding general of Fort McCoy, Wisconsin. The
letter was given to all Soldiers being processed out of the Service at
Fort McCoy at the conclusion of World War II. I share with you just a
few words from that letter that still resonate today:
Your generation will be called upon to guide our country’s destiny.
The responsibility for leadership is yours . . . Make your voice
heard, for honor and decency among men, for the rights of all people .
. . The people of America are counting on you.[10]
Then-LTC Hayes instructing local junior high-school students, and
perhaps future judge advocates, before presiding over their mock trial
in Fort Bliss, TX, circa 2014. (Photo courtesy of author)
As I look back on my career with pride and look forward to the next
generation’s achievements with expectation, I encourage each of you
who stand in the gap today to be committed to the character that led
you to become a member of the Judge Advocate General’s Corps.
Furthermore, I exhort each of you to embrace your role as an
ambassador for our regiment, to do everything within your power to
ensure the person who will one day take your place in the line when
you fall, or when you fade away as old Soldiers do, has every bit of
the character and commitment that you have brought to the fight every
day of your career. As your comrade-in-arms who has strived to do
likewise, I salute each of you and wish you Godspeed.
COL Hayes is an Associate Judge on the Army Court of Criminal
Appeals at Fort Belvoir, Virginia. He will retire from the Army in
the spring of 2024.
[1]
For example, after assembly, substitution of the military judge or
members may only occur for good cause and the accused may no
longer request, or withdraw a request for, members.
See UCMJ arts. 25, 29 (2022).
[2]
Military Justice Act of 2016, Pub. L. No. 114-328, § 5182, 130
Stat.
[3]
See UCMJ art. 29 (2022).
[4]
See
Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, R.C.M. 912(d) discussion (2024).
[5]
The Judge Advoc. Gen.’s Corps, U.S. Army, Four Constants
(n.d.),
https://www.jagcnet.army.mil/Sites/JAGC.nsf/46DCA0CA1EE75266852586C5004A681F/$File/US%20Army%20JAG%20Corps%20Four%20Constants%20Smart%20Card.pdf.
[6]
The Army Values,
U.S. Army,
https://www.army.mil/values (last visited Jan. 9, 2024).
[8]
William Shakespeare, Henry V.
[9]
Id. act IV, sc. 3, l. 25.
[10]
Letter from Brigadier Gen. John K. Rice, Commanding Gen., Ft.
McCoy, Wis., to Departing Service Members (1946) (on file with
author).